Connect/Follow Me

 

Subscribe By RSS
Subscribe by Email
Recent Posts
Login
My Book
  • Fixing the 401(k): What Fiduciaries Must Know (And Do) to Help Employees Retire Successfully
    Fixing the 401(k): What Fiduciaries Must Know (And Do) to Help Employees Retire Successfully
    by Joshua P. Itzoe
My Firm

Search
Recommended Reading
  • Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment
    Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment
    by David F. Swensen
  • Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard
    Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard
    by Chip Heath, Dan Heath
  • Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
    Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die
    by Chip Heath, Dan Heath
  • Stop the Retirement Rip-off: How to Avoid Hidden Fees and Keep More of Your Money
    Stop the Retirement Rip-off: How to Avoid Hidden Fees and Keep More of Your Money
    by David B. Loeper
  • The Smartest 401k Book You'll Ever Read: Maximize Your Retirement Savings...the Smart Way!
    The Smartest 401k Book You'll Ever Read: Maximize Your Retirement Savings...the Smart Way!
    by Daniel R. Solin
  • The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
    The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression
    by Amity Shlaes
« A (Nearly) Perfectly Implemented Investment Strategy for a 401(k) Plan | Main | In the News - Greenspring Research Highlighted »
Wednesday
09Sep2009

Does Better Fiduciary Process Lead to Better Performance?

Here's an interesting post titled "Does Adherance to the Practices Really Make a Difference?" from the Fi360 Blog.  One of the mantra's of the Fixing the 401(k) Approach is that "better process leads to better decision-making which, over time, increases the probability of better outcomes."  

Rich Lynch, COO of Fi360, essentially makes the same argument and backs it up with some interesting data points from a recent study conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) which is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress.  

In a previous post, I wrote about the fiduciary duty to uncover conflicts of interest when hiring a retirement plan advisor.  In it, I referenced an SEC study from 2005 that raised issues regarding the independence of the advice provided by pension consultants.  

The GAO study Rich references is entitled, "Private Pensions - Conflicts of Interest Can Affect Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans" and is a follow-up to the SEC study that was published in March 2009.  The GAO analyzed the lack of disclosure regarding conflicts of interest and the impact on returns of defined-benefit (DB) plans from 2000-2004.

The GAO conducted an "analysis of available data on pension consultants and plans revealed a statistical association between inadequate disclosure and lower investment returns for ongoing plans, suggesting the possible adverse financial effect of such nondisclosure."  The study detected statistically significant lower annual rates of return of 1.2 to 1.3 percentage points from 2000 to 2004 when consultants did not adequately disclose conflicts of interest.   The GAO is careful to make the point "that this finding should not be considered as proof of causality between conflicts and lower rates of return, although it suggests the importance of detecting the presence of conflicts among pension plan consultants." 

Rich cited Practice 1.4 of Fi360's Prudent Practices for Investment Advisors handbook which says "Fiduciaries and parties in interest are not involved in self-dealing" as evidence that there is the strong possibility of the link of better fiduciary process leading to better performance.  

You can read the GAO's executive summary and download the full report, here.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>